Multidisciplinary Collaboration in the Treatment of Patients With Type 2 Diabetes in Primary Care: Analysis Using Process Mining

[EN] Background: Public health in several countries is characterized by a shortage of professionals and a lack of economic resources. Monitoring and redesigning processes can foster the success of health care institutions, enabling them to provide a quality service while simultaneously reducing costs. Process mining, a discipline that extracts knowledge from information system data to analyze operational processes, affords an opportunity to understand health care processes. Objective: Health care processes are highly flexible and multidisciplinary, and health care professionals are able to coordinate in a variety of different ways to treat a diagnosis. The aim of this work was to understand whether the ways in which professionals coordinate their work affect the clinical outcome of patients. Methods: This paper proposes a method based on the use of process mining to identify patterns of collaboration between physician, nurse, and dietitian in the treatment of patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus and to compare these patterns with the clinical evolution of the patients within the context of primary care. Clustering is used as part of the preprocessing of data to manage the variability, and then process mining is used to identify patterns that may arise. Results: The method is applied in three primary health care centers in Santiago, Chile. A total of seven collaboration patterns were identified, which differed primarily in terms of the number of disciplines present, the participation intensity of each discipline, and the referrals between disciplines. The pattern in which the three disciplines participated in the most equitable and comprehensive manner had a lower proportion of highly decompensated patients compared with those patterns in which the three disciplines participated in an unbalanced manner. Conclusions: By discovering which collaboration patterns lead to improved outcomes, health care centers can promote the most successful patterns among their professionals so as to improve the treatment of patients. Process mining techniques are useful for discovering those collaborations patterns in flexible and unstructured health care processes.This paper was partially funded by the National Commission for Scientific and Technological Research, the Formation of Advanced Human Capital Program and the National Fund for Scientific and Technological Development (CONICYT-PCHA/Doctorado Nacional/2016-21161705 and CONICYT-FONDECYT/1150365; Chile). The authors would like to thank Ancora UC primary health care centers for their help with this research. The founding sponsors had no role in the design of the study in the collection, analyses, or interpretation of data; in the writing of the manuscript; or in the decision to publish the results.Conca, T.; Saint Pierre, C.; Herskovic, V.; Sepulveda, M.; Capurro, D.; Prieto, F.; Fernández Llatas, C. (2018). Multidisciplinary Collaboration in the Treatment of Patients With Type 2 Diabetes in Primary Care: Analysis Using Process Mining. JOURNAL OF MEDICAL INTERNET RESEARCH. 20(4). https://doi.org/10.2196/jmir.8884S204Chen, C.-C., Tseng, C.-H., & Cheng, S.-H. (2013). Continuity of Care, Medication Adherence, and Health Care Outcomes Among Patients With Newly Diagnosed Type 2 Diabetes. Medical Care, 51(3), 231-237. doi:10.1097/mlr.0b013e31827da5b9International Diabetes FederationIDF20152018-03-19IDF Diabetes Atlas 7th Edition (2015) https://www.idf.org/e-library/epidemiology-research/diabetes-atlas/13-diabetes-atlas-seventh-edition.htmlMinisterio de Salud de Chileminsal.cl20102018-03-23Encuesta Nacional de Salud ENS Chile 2009-2010 http://www.minsal.cl/estudios_encuestas_salud/Ministerio de Salud de Chileminsal.cl20102018-03-20Guía Clinica Diabetes Mellitus Tipo 2 http://www.minsal.cl/portal/url/item/72213ed52c3e23d1e04001011f011398.pdfSapunar Z., J. (2016). EPIDEMIOLOGÍA DE LA DIABETES MELLITUS EN CHILE. Revista Médica Clínica Las Condes, 27(2), 146-151. doi:10.1016/j.rmclc.2016.04.003World Health Organizationwho.int2018-03-20Global Report on Diabetes http://www.who.int/diabetes/global-report/en/Poblete, F., Glasinovic, A., Sapag, J., Barticevic, N., Arenas, A., & Padilla, O. (2015). Apoyo social y salud cardiovascular: adaptación de una escala de apoyo social en pacientes hipertensos y diabéticos en la atención primaria chilena. Atención Primaria, 47(8), 523-531. doi:10.1016/j.aprim.2014.10.010Tuligenga, R. H., Dugravot, A., Tabák, A. G., Elbaz, A., Brunner, E. J., Kivimäki, M., & Singh-Manoux, A. (2014). Midlife type 2 diabetes and poor glycaemic control as risk factors for cognitive decline in early old age: a post-hoc analysis of the Whitehall II cohort study. The Lancet Diabetes & Endocrinology, 2(3), 228-235. doi:10.1016/s2213-8587(13)70192-xGamiochipi, M., Cruz, M., Kumate, J., & Wacher, N. H. (2016). Effect of an intensive metabolic control lifestyle intervention in type-2 diabetes patients. Patient Education and Counseling, 99(7), 1184-1189. doi:10.1016/j.pec.2016.01.017Wagner, E. H. (2001). Effect of Improved Glycemic Control on Health Care Costs and Utilization. JAMA, 285(2), 182. doi:10.1001/jama.285.2.182McDonald, J., Jayasuriya, R., & Harris, M. F. (2012). The influence of power dynamics and trust on multidisciplinary collaboration: a qualitative case study of type 2 diabetes mellitus. BMC Health Services Research, 12(1). doi:10.1186/1472-6963-12-63Gucciardi, E., Espin, S., Morganti, A., & Dorado, L. (2016). Exploring interprofessional collaboration during the integration of diabetes teams into primary care. BMC Family Practice, 17(1). doi:10.1186/s12875-016-0407-1Caron, F., Vanthienen, J., Vanhaecht, K., Limbergen, E. V., De Weerdt, J., & Baesens, B. (2014). Monitoring care processes in the gynecologic oncology department. Computers in Biology and Medicine, 44, 88-96. doi:10.1016/j.compbiomed.2013.10.015Rothman, A. A., & Wagner, E. H. (2003). Chronic Illness Management: What Is the Role of Primary Care? Annals of Internal Medicine, 138(3), 256. doi:10.7326/0003-4819-138-3-200302040-00034Organisation for Economic Co-operation and DevelopmentOECD20162018-03-20OECD Health Policy Overview: Health Policy in Chile http://www.oecd.org/els/health-systems/health-policy-in-your-country.htmRojas, E., Munoz-Gama, J., Sepúlveda, M., & Capurro, D. (2016). Process mining in healthcare: A literature review. Journal of Biomedical Informatics, 61, 224-236. doi:10.1016/j.jbi.2016.04.007Fernandez-Llatas, C., Lizondo, A., Monton, E., Benedi, J.-M., & Traver, V. (2015). Process Mining Methodology for Health Process Tracking Using Real-Time Indoor Location Systems. Sensors, 15(12), 29821-29840. doi:10.3390/s151229769Mans, R. S., van der Aalst, W. M. P., & Vanwersch, R. J. B. (2015). Process Mining in Healthcare. SpringerBriefs in Business Process Management. doi:10.1007/978-3-319-16071-9Van der Aalst, W. M. P. (2011). Process Mining. doi:10.1007/978-3-642-19345-3Kim, E., Kim, S., Song, M., Kim, S., Yoo, D., Hwang, H., & Yoo, S. (2013). Discovery of Outpatient Care Process of a Tertiary University Hospital Using Process Mining. Healthcare Informatics Research, 19(1), 42. doi:10.4258/hir.2013.19.1.42Harper, P. R., Sayyad, M. G., de Senna, V., Shahani, A. K., Yajnik, C. S., & Shelgikar, K. M. (2003). A systems modelling approach for the prevention and treatment of diabetic retinopathy. European Journal of Operational Research, 150(1), 81-91. doi:10.1016/s0377-2217(02)00787-7Rebuge, Á., & Ferreira, D. R. (2012). Business process analysis in healthcare environments: A methodology based on process mining. Information Systems, 37(2), 99-116. doi:10.1016/j.is.2011.01.003Ferreira, D., Zacarias, M., Malheiros, M., & Ferreira, P. (2007). Approaching Process Mining with Sequence Clustering: Experiments and Findings. Business Process Management, 360-374. doi:10.1007/978-3-540-75183-0_26Cheong, L. H., Armour, C. L., & Bosnic-Anticevich, S. Z. (2013). Multidisciplinary collaboration in primary care: through the eyes of patients. Australian Journal of Primary Health, 19(3), 190. doi:10.1071/py12019Boyle, E., Saunders, R., & Drury, V. (2016). A qualitative study of patient experiences of Type 2 Diabetes care delivered comparatively by General Practice Nurses and Medical Practitioners. Journal of Clinical Nursing, 25(13-14), 1977-1986. doi:10.1111/jocn.13219UddinSHossainLEffects of Physician Collaboration Network on Hospital Outcomes2012Fifth Australasian Workshop on Health Informatics and Knowledge Management (HIKM 2012)2012Melbourne, AustraliaBorgermans, L., Goderis, G., Van Den Broeke, C., Verbeke, G., Carbonez, A., Ivanova, A., … Grol, R. (2009). Interdisciplinary diabetes care teams operating on the interface between primary and specialty care are associated with improved outcomes of care: findings from the Leuven Diabetes Project. BMC Health Services Research, 9(1). doi:10.1186/1472-6963-9-179Bosch, M., Dijkstra, R., Wensing, M., van der Weijden, T., & Grol, R. (2008). Organizational culture, team climate and diabetes care in small office-based practices. BMC Health Services Research, 8(1). doi:10.1186/1472-6963-8-180Counsell, S. R., Callahan, C. M., Clark, D. O., Tu, W., Buttar, A. B., Stump, T. E., & Ricketts, G. D. (2007). Geriatric Care Management for Low-Income Seniors. JAMA, 298(22), 2623. doi:10.1001/jama.298.22.2623Anderson, J. G. (2002). Evaluation in health informatics: social network analysis. Computers in Biology and Medicine, 32(3), 179-193. doi:10.1016/s0010-4825(02)00014-8Gray, J. E., Davis, D. A., Pursley, D. M., Smallcomb, J. E., Geva, A., & Chawla, N. V. (2010). Network Analysis of Team Structure in the Neonatal Intensive Care Unit. PEDIATRICS, 125(6), e1460-e1467. doi:10.1542/peds.2009-2621Mian, O., Koren, I., & Rukholm, E. (2012). Nurse practitioners in Ontario primary healthcare: Referral patterns and collaboration with other healthcare professionals. Journal of Interprofessional Care, 26(3), 232-239. doi:10.3109/13561820.2011.650300Crossley, N., Bellotti, E., Edwards, G., Everett, M. G., Koskinen, J., & Tranmer, M. (2015). Social Network Analysis for Ego-Nets. doi:10.4135/9781473911871Ministerio de Salud de Chile2018-03-20Fondo Nacional de Salud https://www.fonasa.cl/sites/fonasa/beneficiariosGoldstein, D. E., Little, R. R., Lorenz, R. A., Malone, J. I., Nathan, D., Peterson, C. M., & Sacks, D. B. (2004). Tests of Glycemia in Diabetes. Diabetes Care, 27(7), 1761-1773. doi:10.2337/diacare.27.7.1761Meduru, P., Helmer, D., Rajan, M., Tseng, C.-L., Pogach, L., & Sambamoorthi, U. (2007). Chronic Illness with Complexity: Implications for Performance Measurement of Optimal Glycemic Control. Journal of General Internal Medicine, 22(S3), 408-418. doi:10.1007/s11606-007-0310-5Vermeire, E., Hearnshaw, H., Van Royen, P., & Denekens, J. (2001). Patient adherence to treatment: three decades of research. A comprehensive review. Journal of Clinical Pharmacy and Therapeutics, 26(5), 331-342. doi:10.1046/j.1365-2710.2001.00363.xKarter, A. J., Parker, M. M., Moffet, H. H., Ahmed, A. T., Ferrara, A., Liu, J. Y., & Selby, J. V. (2004). Missed Appointments and Poor Glycemic Control. Medical Care, 42(2), 110-115. doi:10.1097/01.mlr.0000109023.64650.73World Health Organization20032018-03-20Adherence to long-term therapies: evidence for action http://www.who.int/chp/knowledge/publications/adherence_report/en/Toth, E. L., Majumdar, S. R., Guirguis, L. M., Lewanczuk, R. Z., Lee, T. K., & Johnson, J. A. (2003). Compliance with Clinical Practice Guidelines for Type 2 Diabetes in Rural Patients: Treatment Gaps and Opportunities for Improvement. Pharmacotherapy, 23(5), 659-665. doi:10.1592/phco.23.5.659.32203Melnikow, J., & Kiefe, C. (1994). Patient compliance and medical research. Journal of General Internal Medicine, 9(2), 96-105. doi:10.1007/bf02600211Fernandez-Llatas, C., Valdivieso, B., Traver, V., & Benedi, J. M. (2014). Using Process Mining for Automatic Support of Clinical Pathways Design. Data Mining in Clinical Medicine, 79-88. doi:10.1007/978-1-4939-1985-7_5Fernández-Llatas, C., Benedi, J.-M., García-Gómez, J., & Traver, V. (2013). Process Mining for Individualized Behavior Modeling Using Wireless Tracking in Nursing Homes. Sensors, 13(11), 15434-15451. doi:10.3390/s131115434Wishah, R. A., Al-Khawaldeh, O. A., & Albsoul, A. M. (2015). Impact of pharmaceutical care interventions on glycemic control and other health-related clinical outcomes in patients with type 2 diabetes: Randomized controlled trial. Diabetes & Metabolic Syndrome: Clinical Research & Reviews, 9(4), 271-276. doi:10.1016/j.dsx.2014.09.00

Association of the PHACTR1/EDN1 genetic locus with spontaneous coronary artery dissection

Background: Spontaneous coronary artery dissection (SCAD) is an increasingly recognized cause of acute coronary syndromes (ACS) afflicting predominantly younger to middle-aged women. Observational studies have reported a high prevalence of extracoronary vascular anomalies, especially fibromuscular dysplasia (FMD) and a low prevalence of coincidental cases of atherosclerosis. PHACTR1/EDN1 is a genetic risk locus for several vascular diseases, including FMD and coronary artery disease, with the putative causal noncoding variant at the rs9349379 locus acting as a potential enhancer for the endothelin-1 (EDN1) gene. Objectives: This study sought to test the association between the rs9349379 genotype and SCAD. Methods: Results from case control studies from France, United Kingdom, United States, and Australia were analyzed to test the association with SCAD risk, including age at first event, pregnancy-associated SCAD (P-SCAD), and recurrent SCAD. Results: The previously reported risk allele for FMD (rs9349379-A) was associated with a higher risk of SCAD in all studies. In a meta-analysis of 1,055 SCAD patients and 7,190 controls, the odds ratio (OR) was 1.67 (95% confidence interval [CI]: 1.50 to 1.86) per copy of rs9349379-A. In a subset of 491 SCAD patients, the OR estimate was found to be higher for the association with SCAD in patients without FMD (OR: 1.89; 95% CI: 1.53 to 2.33) than in SCAD cases with FMD (OR: 1.60; 95% CI: 1.28 to 1.99). There was no effect of genotype on age at first event, P-SCAD, or recurrence. Conclusions: The first genetic risk factor for SCAD was identified in the largest study conducted to date for this condition. This genetic link may contribute to the clinical overlap between SCAD and FMD

Mortality and pulmonary complications in patients undergoing surgery with perioperative SARS-CoV-2 infection: an international cohort study

Background: The impact of severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2) on postoperative recovery needs to be understood to inform clinical decision making during and after the COVID-19 pandemic. This study reports 30-day mortality and pulmonary complication rates in patients with perioperative SARS-CoV-2 infection. Methods: This international, multicentre, cohort study at 235 hospitals in 24 countries included all patients undergoing surgery who had SARS-CoV-2 infection confirmed within 7 days before or 30 days after surgery. The primary outcome measure was 30-day postoperative mortality and was assessed in all enrolled patients. The main secondary outcome measure was pulmonary complications, defined as pneumonia, acute respiratory distress syndrome, or unexpected postoperative ventilation. Findings: This analysis includes 1128 patients who had surgery between Jan 1 and March 31, 2020, of whom 835 (74·0%) had emergency surgery and 280 (24·8%) had elective surgery. SARS-CoV-2 infection was confirmed preoperatively in 294 (26·1%) patients. 30-day mortality was 23·8% (268 of 1128). Pulmonary complications occurred in 577 (51·2%) of 1128 patients; 30-day mortality in these patients was 38·0% (219 of 577), accounting for 81·7% (219 of 268) of all deaths. In adjusted analyses, 30-day mortality was associated with male sex (odds ratio 1·75 [95% CI 1·28–2·40], p\textless0·0001), age 70 years or older versus younger than 70 years (2·30 [1·65–3·22], p\textless0·0001), American Society of Anesthesiologists grades 3–5 versus grades 1–2 (2·35 [1·57–3·53], p\textless0·0001), malignant versus benign or obstetric diagnosis (1·55 [1·01–2·39], p=0·046), emergency versus elective surgery (1·67 [1·06–2·63], p=0·026), and major versus minor surgery (1·52 [1·01–2·31], p=0·047). Interpretation: Postoperative pulmonary complications occur in half of patients with perioperative SARS-CoV-2 infection and are associated with high mortality. Thresholds for surgery during the COVID-19 pandemic should be higher than during normal practice, particularly in men aged 70 years and older. Consideration should be given for postponing non-urgent procedures and promoting non-operative treatment to delay or avoid the need for surgery. Funding: National Institute for Health Research (NIHR), Association of Coloproctology of Great Britain and Ireland, Bowel and Cancer Research, Bowel Disease Research Foundation, Association of Upper Gastrointestinal Surgeons, British Association of Surgical Oncology, British Gynaecological Cancer Society, European Society of Coloproctology, NIHR Academy, Sarcoma UK, Vascular Society for Great Britain and Ireland, and Yorkshire Cancer Research

Performance of non-invasive tests and histology for the prediction of clinical outcomes in patients with non-alcoholic fatty liver disease: an individual participant data meta-analysis

BackgroundHistologically assessed liver fibrosis stage has prognostic significance in patients with non-alcoholic fatty liver disease (NAFLD) and is accepted as a surrogate endpoint in clinical trials for non-cirrhotic NAFLD. Our aim was to compare the prognostic performance of non-invasive tests with liver histology in patients with NAFLD.MethodsThis was an individual participant data meta-analysis of the prognostic performance of histologically assessed fibrosis stage (F0–4), liver stiffness measured by vibration-controlled transient elastography (LSM-VCTE), fibrosis-4 index (FIB-4), and NAFLD fibrosis score (NFS) in patients with NAFLD. The literature was searched for a previously published systematic review on the diagnostic accuracy of imaging and simple non-invasive tests and updated to Jan 12, 2022 for this study. Studies were identified through PubMed/MEDLINE, EMBASE, and CENTRAL, and authors were contacted for individual participant data, including outcome data, with a minimum of 12 months of follow-up. The primary outcome was a composite endpoint of all-cause mortality, hepatocellular carcinoma, liver transplantation, or cirrhosis complications (ie, ascites, variceal bleeding, hepatic encephalopathy, or progression to a MELD score ≥15). We calculated aggregated survival curves for trichotomised groups and compared them using stratified log-rank tests (histology: F0–2 vs F3 vs F4; LSM: 2·67; NFS: 0·676), calculated areas under the time-dependent receiver operating characteristic curves (tAUC), and performed Cox proportional-hazards regression to adjust for confounding. This study was registered with PROSPERO, CRD42022312226.FindingsOf 65 eligible studies, we included data on 2518 patients with biopsy-proven NAFLD from 25 studies (1126 [44·7%] were female, median age was 54 years [IQR 44–63), and 1161 [46·1%] had type 2 diabetes). After a median follow-up of 57 months [IQR 33–91], the composite endpoint was observed in 145 (5·8%) patients. Stratified log-rank tests showed significant differences between the trichotomised patient groups (p<0·0001 for all comparisons). The tAUC at 5 years were 0·72 (95% CI 0·62–0·81) for histology, 0·76 (0·70–0·83) for LSM-VCTE, 0·74 (0·64–0·82) for FIB-4, and 0·70 (0·63–0·80) for NFS. All index tests were significant predictors of the primary outcome after adjustment for confounders in the Cox regression.InterpretationSimple non-invasive tests performed as well as histologically assessed fibrosis in predicting clinical outcomes in patients with NAFLD and could be considered as alternatives to liver biopsy in some cases

Effect of angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitor and angiotensin receptor blocker initiation on organ support-free days in patients hospitalized with COVID-19

IMPORTANCE Overactivation of the renin-angiotensin system (RAS) may contribute to poor clinical outcomes in patients with COVID-19. Objective To determine whether angiotensin-converting enzyme (ACE) inhibitor or angiotensin receptor blocker (ARB) initiation improves outcomes in patients hospitalized for COVID-19. DESIGN, SETTING, AND PARTICIPANTS In an ongoing, adaptive platform randomized clinical trial, 721 critically ill and 58 non–critically ill hospitalized adults were randomized to receive an RAS inhibitor or control between March 16, 2021, and February 25, 2022, at 69 sites in 7 countries (final follow-up on June 1, 2022). INTERVENTIONS Patients were randomized to receive open-label initiation of an ACE inhibitor (n = 257), ARB (n = 248), ARB in combination with DMX-200 (a chemokine receptor-2 inhibitor; n = 10), or no RAS inhibitor (control; n = 264) for up to 10 days. MAIN OUTCOMES AND MEASURES The primary outcome was organ support–free days, a composite of hospital survival and days alive without cardiovascular or respiratory organ support through 21 days. The primary analysis was a bayesian cumulative logistic model. Odds ratios (ORs) greater than 1 represent improved outcomes. RESULTS On February 25, 2022, enrollment was discontinued due to safety concerns. Among 679 critically ill patients with available primary outcome data, the median age was 56 years and 239 participants (35.2%) were women. Median (IQR) organ support–free days among critically ill patients was 10 (–1 to 16) in the ACE inhibitor group (n = 231), 8 (–1 to 17) in the ARB group (n = 217), and 12 (0 to 17) in the control group (n = 231) (median adjusted odds ratios of 0.77 [95% bayesian credible interval, 0.58-1.06] for improvement for ACE inhibitor and 0.76 [95% credible interval, 0.56-1.05] for ARB compared with control). The posterior probabilities that ACE inhibitors and ARBs worsened organ support–free days compared with control were 94.9% and 95.4%, respectively. Hospital survival occurred in 166 of 231 critically ill participants (71.9%) in the ACE inhibitor group, 152 of 217 (70.0%) in the ARB group, and 182 of 231 (78.8%) in the control group (posterior probabilities that ACE inhibitor and ARB worsened hospital survival compared with control were 95.3% and 98.1%, respectively). CONCLUSIONS AND RELEVANCE In this trial, among critically ill adults with COVID-19, initiation of an ACE inhibitor or ARB did not improve, and likely worsened, clinical outcomes. TRIAL REGISTRATION ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: NCT0273570

Relationship between Continuity of Care in the Multidisciplinary Treatment of Patients with Diabetes and Their Clinical Results

Multidisciplinary treatment and continuity of care throughout treatment are important for ensuring metabolic control and avoiding complications in diabetic patients. This study examines the relationship between continuity of care of the treating disciplines and clinical evolution of patients. Data from 1836 adult patients experiencing type 2 diabetes mellitus were analyzed, in a period between 12 and 24 months. Continuity was measured by using four well known indices: Usual Provider Continuity (UPC), Continuity of Care Index (COCI), Herfindahl Index (HI), and Sequential Continuity (SECON). Patients were divided into five segments according to metabolic control: well-controlled, worsened, moderately decompensated, highly decompensated, and improved. Well-controlled patients had higher continuity by physicians according to UPC and HI indices (p-values 0.029 and &lt;0.003), whereas highly decompensated patients had less continuity in HI (p-value 0.020). Continuity for nurses was similar, with a greater continuity among well-controlled patients (p-values 0.015 and 0.001 for UPC and HI indices), and less among highly decompensated patients (p-values 0.004 and &lt;0.001 for UPC and HI indices). Improved patients had greater adherence to the protocol than those who worsened. The SECON index showed no significant differences across the disciplines. This study identified a relationship between physicians and nurse&rsquo;s continuity of care and metabolic control in patients with diabetes, consistent with qualitative findings that highlight the role of nurses in treatment

Analysis of the Relationship between the Referral and Evolution of Patients with Type 2 Diabetes Mellitus

Type 2 Diabetes Mellitus (T2DM) is a chronic disease that has risen in prominence in recent years and can cause serious complications. Several studies show that the level of adherence to different types of treatment has a direct correlation with the positive evolution of chronic diseases. While such studies relate to patient adherence to medication, those that concern adherence to medical appointments do not distinguish between the different disciplines that attend to or refer patients. This study analyses the relationship between adherence to referrals made by three distinct disciplines (doctors, nurses, and nutritionists) and the results of HbA1c tests from a sample of 2290 patients with T2DM. The aim is to determine whether a relationship exists between patient improvement and the frequency with which they attend scheduled appointments in a timely manner, having been previously referred from or to a particular discipline. Results showed that patients tended to be more adherent when their next appointment is with a doctor, and less adherent when it is with a nurse or nutritionist. Furthermore, patients that remained stable had higher rates of adherence, whereas those with lower adherence tended to be more decompensated. The results can enable healthcare professionals to monitor patients and place particular emphasis on those who do not attend their scheduled appointments in a timely manner